Explore VERTEX
Solutions for real operating problems
Start with the business situation, then combine the capabilities needed to change it in controlled stages.
Page purpose
Use Solutions for real operating problems to choose the path closest to your decision.
The Solutions hub is a problem-led route selector, not a catalogue of packaged services. It starts with recognizable operating situations—such as a legacy ERP constraint, fragmented systems, weak operational truth, manual work or unwanted dependency—and shows which route asks the closest set of questions before architecture or procurement hardens around one option.
Choose the situation nearest to the institution's constraint, compare its boundary and deciding difference with adjacent routes, then test the selected route against the actual process, system ownership and evidence. Overlap is expected when enterprise problems cross systems. The hub narrows where to read next; it does not promise a standardized outcome, diagnose the cause or prescribe an implementation.
Explore
Choose a specialist path within Solutions for real operating problems.
Each page addresses a distinct decision or problem and connects to relevant capabilities, systems and evidence.
Modernize a legacy ERP
Reduce the cost and risk surrounding a viable ERP core through a capability-by-capability intervention across customizations, workflows, data and integration.
Explore details02Replace internal desktop applications
Recover critical behavior and move ageing desktop and database tools to maintainable browser-based applications.
Explore details03Build a unified operations platform
Connect specialized workflows, roles and data in one coherent operating environment without forcing one generic product.
Explore details04Consolidate disconnected systems
Create governed integration and data foundations instead of adding another isolated dashboard or application.
Explore details05Move enterprise applications to cloud
Exit a constrained environment or reposition selected applications through dependency-aware migration waves, with modernization benefits scoped separately.
Explore details06Modernize database-driven applications
Improve the data model, application boundary and interface while preserving critical records and behavior.
Explore details07Create a single source of operational truth
Define ownership, quality and data flows so operational and executive measures can be trusted.
Explore details08Automate manual operations
Simplify workflows before combining applications, APIs, rules and selective automation to remove re-entry.
Explore details09Modernize employee experience
Create coherent employee journeys over HR, finance, service and operational systems of record.
Explore details10Modernize customer and supplier portals
Replace high-volume email and support handoffs with bounded self-service journeys for orders, documents, inventory, service and finance.
Explore details11Integrate ERP, CRM and operations
Connect customer commitments, financial records and operational execution through governed contracts.
Explore details12Build multi-company platforms
Establish a governed shared-services product for a group, with explicit company configuration, intercompany controls and rollout rights.
Explore details13Improve enterprise reporting
Connect metrics to governed operational sources, definitions and accountable owners.
Explore details14Enable AI on enterprise data
Move one bounded AI use case from experiment to accountable production workflow with governed data, evaluation, human review and operating ownership.
Explore details15Reduce dependency on legacy vendors
Create open boundaries, documentation, source ownership, knowledge transfer and an executable exit path.
Explore details16Scale without rebuilding everything
Identify the actual performance and change constraints, then decompose or improve only what needs independent scale.
Explore detailsStarting questions
When is this hub the right starting point?
- Buyers can name a painful operating symptom but not the underlying system boundary.
- Product-led proposals arrive before process, data and ownership constraints are understood.
- Overlapping modernization situations make generic service descriptions difficult to apply.
- A quick fix can move the bottleneck to another team or system.
Choose a route
Decisions that lead to the specialist page.
- Whether the constraint is local to one system or crosses an end-to-end process.
- Whether improvement requires extension, integration, data work, replacement or a combination.
- Whether the next step should reduce uncertainty or begin a bounded implementation slice.
Expected clarity
What should be clearer after exploring?
- A problem statement connected to relevant system, data and ownership boundaries.
- A shortlist of plausible modernization paths and the evidence needed to compare them.
- Clearer separation between immediate relief, transition work and durable operating change.
What you will find
The content paths available here.
- A problem-led index of common enterprise modernization situations.
- Route-specific context, dependencies and transition considerations.
- Links to the capabilities and systems implicated by each situation.
- Questions that help distinguish similar solution paths.
Decision questions
Choose a route without unnecessary browsing.
What if more than one solution route describes our situation?
That is common when a constraint crosses systems. Compare the routes by primary cause, decision owner and the evidence each one needs. One route can frame the main outcome while related routes identify dependencies; discovery should then confirm whether separate workstreams are justified.
What does a solution route represent?
It is an editorial frame for a recurring problem shape, not a predetermined product or scope. The actual path depends on current architecture, process variation, data condition, risk tolerance, operational continuity and the responsibilities the institution can own.